This article is brought to you by VicOne.Robot safety has traditionally asked: Can a machine remain safe when something goes wrong? Physical AI raises a harder question: Can a machine remain safe when an attacker changes what it sees, decides, or does even when nothing appears to have failed?As AI and robotics continue to advance at an unprecedented pace, modern robots perceive through multimodal sensors, interpret context using AI models, and translate those interpretations into physical action. As they move into dynamic environments, their safety increasingly depends on the integrity of the data guiding their decisions.That dependence creates risks that conventional safety assessments may not fully capture. Recent research has demonstrated that manipulating what a robot sees, hears, or interprets can influence its behavior without requiring direct control.Such manipulation can occur anywhere across its complex sensing and decision-making system — a layered attack surface encompass
UPVOTERS
Community appreciation
See who found this content valuable and showed their support.
TOPICS
Explore the same topics
Discover more content from the topics this post is mapped to.
Keep browsing
Explore more from this topic
Dive into the full feed of curated posts covering Robotics & Automation.
Discussion
Break the silence
Take the opportunity to kick things off.