This article is brought to you by Queen’s University Belfast.Several teams around the globe are leveraging AI by creating a task force of agents managed by an orchestrator and creating applications to support risk assessment, client profiling, match making, and information yield with a slight overview of decision making. One of the important components for these agents is to ensure that the logs are managed and historic relevance is not being used to avoid skewing towards same decision making. Thus, the system is expected to keep checkpoints in place where agents are prompted to delete such historic relevance.However, despite such methodology in place, a future prompt could make the agents bring forward the information that was supposed to be deleted and can be tricked into revealing more information, which is a classic case of context recovery attack. So, the question raised here is: How can we trust that our instructions have been followed? And where is the proof?There is an eleme
UPVOTERS
Community appreciation
See who found this content valuable and showed their support.
TOPICS
Explore the same topics
Discover more content from the topics this post is mapped to.
Keep browsing
Explore more from this topic
Dive into the full feed of curated posts covering Robotics & Automation.
Discussion
Leave the first comment
Be the first to leave a mark on this discussion.